if (!checkrights("ERRO") || !defined("iAUTH") || !isset($_GET['aid']) || $_GET['aid'] != iAUTH) { die("Acces Denied");
redirect("../index.php");
66.249.67.211 - - [02/May/2014:16:55:17 +0100] "GET /administration/index.php?aid=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&pagenum=5 HTTP/1.1" 302 - "-" "Mediapartners-Google"
if (!checkrights("ERRO") || !defined("iAUTH") || !isset($_GET['aid']) || $_GET['aid'] != iAUTH) { redirect("../index.php"); }
Quote
now I ticked the box and it should not track me now
Quote
Tell Sites that I do not want to be tracked.
Quote
BrandonBlack wrote:Quote
now I ticked the box and it should not track me now
Tell yourself what you must to sleep at night and get through the day. Fact of the matter is, we are only a few years away from enjoying complete surveillance. My suggestion is, accept now that you have no privacy, and when you find that they have breached it, you wont spend time being angry.
OR you could live off the grid hermit style. However, the only programming available in that scenario comes in the form of gardening, wood working, and psychological rehabilitation.
Be on the side that helps to usher in the new age, and that advances us toward the singularity versus away. Connected versus Disconnected, these are your only two options.
Quote
"The Court takes the view that, by requiring the retention of those data and by allowing the competent national authorities to access those data, the directive interferes in a particularly serious manner with the fundamental rights to respect for private life and to the protection of personal data,
Quote
And yet, in our rush to respond to a very real and novel set of threats, the risk of government overreach, the possibility that we lose some of our core liberties in pursuit of security also became more pronounced. We saw in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 our government engage in enhanced interrogation techniques that contradicted our values. As a senator, I was critical of several practices, such as warrantless wiretaps. And all too often new authorities were instituted without adequate public debate.
Quote
First, the same technological advances that allow U.S. intelligence agencies to pinpoint an al-Qaida (sale ?) in Yemen or an email between two terrorists in the Sahel also mean that many routine communications around the world are within our reach. And at a time when more and more of our lives are digital, that prospect is disquieting for all of us. Second, the combination of increased digital information and powerful supercomputers offers intelligence agencies the possibility of sifting through massive amounts of bulk data to identify patterns or pursue leads that may thwart impending threats. It’s a powerful tool. But the government collection and storage of such bulk data also creates a potential for abuse.
Third, the legal safeguards that restrict surveillance against U.S. persons without a warrant do not apply to foreign persons overseas. This is not unique to America; few, if any, spy agencies around the world constrain their activities beyond their own borders. And the whole point of intelligence is to obtain information that is not publicly available.
Quote
That places a special obligation on us to ask tough questions about what we should do.
Category Forum
Announcements & Security IssuesLabels
None yet
Statistics
5 participants
Notifications
You are not receiving notifications from this thread.
Related Questions